Descriptive analytics

In the current investigation, analyses regarding your first purpose of the research was in fact carried out in two degrees. 1st, brand new correlations between narcissism and motives towards infidelity was basically tested (Figs step 1 and 2), and you may later, the fresh moderating effect analysis is carried out. Ahead of the design screening, first analyses had been achieved to disclose the newest zero-buy correlations, means, and you may simple deviations one of many ten observed parameters, which are said from inside the Dining table 1. This new skewness beliefs on the seen variables varied of .11 to just one.08, in addition to kurtosis variables was in fact between .08 and you can step 1.38. These types of thinking reveal that the fresh statistical appropriateness of one’s parameters are ensured with regards to normal shipping assumptions.

Attempt of your aspect model

In the dimension model, the brand new noticed details was indeed designated toward latent variables on the structural design. As the same hidden variables (narcissism, purposes on unfaithfulness, and you may relationship satisfaction) was included in both designs, a single aspect design decide to try try did. Just as in the fresh observed details, the total an incredible number of the latest NPI subscales supported due to the fact latent changeable having narcissism. To your purposes for the infidelity and you will matchmaking fulfillment latent details, parcels was assigned proportionally into quantity of items just like the bills one to assess the variables was indeed couched during the a-one-dimensional build. Which parcelling method was performed because of the delegating scales for the parcels depending on the calculated number of parcels, with regards to the items-total relationship viewpoints.

According to the tests of the measurement model utilized as the model for the study, the goodness of fit values were optimal: ? 2 (32, N = 184) = , p = .001; GFI = .94; AGFI = .89; CFI = .92; IFI = .92; RMSEA = .073 (90% confidence interval for RMSEA = .046–.099). It was determined that the entire factor loads related to the observed variables of all latent variables were high and statistically significant (standardized values ranged from .44 to .91, p < .05; see Table 2).

Decide to try of the structural habits

In this phase of the analysis, two structural models were tested. First, the partial mediation model given in Fig 1 was tested, and the goodness of fit values were found to be close to perfect: ? 2 (32, N = 184) = , p = .001; GFI = .94; AGFI = .89; CFI = .92; IFI = .92; RMSEA = .073 (90% confidence interval for RMSEA = .046–.099). 13, p>.05). However, when the effect of intentions towards infidelity was fixed to zero, the standardized means coefficient between narcissism and relationship satisfaction was found to be statistically significant (? = -.31, p < .01). The path between narcissism and relationship satisfaction was subsequently excluded from the model in order to test the fully mediated model, and the goodness of fit values were calculated as ? 2 (33, N = 184) = , p = .001; GFI = .93; AGFI = .89; CFI = .92; IFI = .92; RMSEA = .072 (90% confidence interval for RMSEA = .046–.098). The chi-square difference test results (1.66, 1: p>.05) indicated that the exclusion of this path from the model did not cause a significant deterioration in the model. The final model after excluding the path is shown in Fig 4. Ultimately, as the model demonstrates, intentions towards infidelity has a full mediating effect on the relationship between narcissism and relationship satisfaction.

Second, the partial mediation model given in Fig 2 was tested and the goodness of fit values were found to be close to perfect: ? 2 (32, N = 184) = , p = .001; GFI = .94; AGFI = .89; CFI = .92; IFI = .92; RMSEA = .073 (90% confidence interval for RMSEA = .046–.099). Additionally, the standardized means coefficient between narcissism and intentions towards infidelity was not found to be statistically significant (? = .14, p>.05). However, when the effect of relationship satisfaction on intentions towards infidelity was nullified, the standardized means coefficient between narcissism and commerciale incontri contadini intentions towards infidelity was found to be statistically significant (? = .35, p < .01). Later, the path between narcissism and intentions towards infidelity was subsequently excluded from the model in order to test the fully mediated model, and the goodness of fit values were calculated as ? 2 (33, N = 184) = , p = .001; GFI = .94; AGFI = .89; CFI = .92; IFI = .92; RMSEA = .073 (90% confidence interval for RMSEA = .046–.098) (chi-square difference test: 1.95, 1: p>.05). This result indicates that the exclusion of this path from the model did not cause a significant deterioration in the model. The final model, shown in Fig 5, indicates that relationship satisfaction has a fully mediating effect between narcissism and intentions towards infidelity.