This study falls under a larger little bit of lookup into the group relations http://datingranking.net/fr/rencontres-strapon and you may related thinking into the additional personal communities. The users was in fact tested after giving its consent written down. Respondents was indeed assured privacy to accomplish some report-and-pencil questionnaires towards ATLG steps directly. Volunteers obtained most credit facts for their direction degrees. The newest ethical requirements of your own Chilean Lookup Payment (CONICYT) was indeed implemented.

Simultaneously, political notice-categorization (asking on the governmental needs coded towards around three classes: left, cardio and you will best) and you can sexual positioning was in fact included

People answered demographic questions to check on ATLG validity: sex, years, socioeconomic standing (high, middle and you will low levels were utilized), and religion identity courtesy notice-revealing for the means to fix practical question „Do you think on your own a spiritual person?” Likewise, a 4-items level size towards a 6-point Likert measure concerning your benefits players share with its religious info inside their each and every day lifetime was utilized.

It was developed in Northern America. ATLG is measured on a 6-point Likert scale. The instrument was translated and adapted (Cardenas Barrientos, 2008) (see the Appendix). The ATLG Spanish language version in this study had not been used with Chilean populations before. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94 for ATLG; 0.88 for ATL; and 0.91 for ATG (The ATLG and the two subscales demonstrated good internal consistence for this sample. The correlation for the two subscales is high (r ₍₅₀₃₎ = 0.84; p < 0.001). ATLG overall mean was 3.52 (SD = 0.75).

Large (next to 6) ratings presented greater prejudice, and you may lower score advertised advantageous attitudes with the homosexuals

Part of the mission was to influence the root ATLG basis framework. Therefore, three basis patterns was indeed estimated: a one-basis design (ATLG contains an individual homophobia cause of and this every situations saturate); a two-foundation correlated model (a few proportions made-up by the ATL and you can ATG subscales whoever circumstances is saturate in the related factor are recommended) and a second order model that have a few synchronised circumstances (in which ATG subscale things create saturate in two proportions – gay Philosophy and Characteristics – and the ones of the ATL level would saturate on the other around three – lesbian Conventional Opinions, and Societal Sanction and you may Personal Legal rights). This type of four size was basically obtained from analyses carried out in prior studies (Cardenas Barrientos, 2008).

Typically, brand new complement is most beneficial when model items was improved. Hence, the two-factor second-order design is among the most parsimonious for everybody spiders gotten. CFI (Comparative Develop List) and you can NFI (Typical Complement Index) spiders inform you beliefs over 0.nine, them considered to be decent (Bentler Dudgeon, 1996). RFI (Relative Enhance Directory) value means 0.9, particularly in the 5-basis model. At the same time, RMSEA (Options Mean square Mistake regarding Approximation) index are extreme that have philosophy lower than 0.08 (Browne Kudeck, 1993), thus verifying an informed match of one’s four-grounds model.

Table 3 also shows the factor saturations for each of the five sub-scales model items. All standardized saturations were significant (p < 0.001). All of the 20 items of the standardized solution loaded on the general grouping factor in the expected direction. The relation between the five latent factors is as follows (covariance): the dimension Social Rights has a high positive correlation with the factor Nature (r = 0.6); moderate positive with both Social Rights (r = 0.43) and Social Sanction (r = 0.038); and high positive with Traditional Values (r = 0.74). The dimension Nature is moderately and positively correlated with Social Rights (r = 0.32) and Social Sanction (r = 0.35), but highly and positively correlated with Traditional Values (r = 0.61). The relation of the dimension Social Rights with Social Sanction (r = 0.31) and Traditional Values (r = 0.37) is moderate high. Finally, the relation between Traditional Values and Social Sanction is moderate positive (r = 0.43).